Three things are never satisfied. Yea, four say not "It is enough":
the grave, and the barren womb, and the earth that is not filled with water, and the fire.
-- Proverbs 30: 15-16
This week everybody was talking about industrial accidents
The death toll from the factory collapse in Bangladesh keeps rising, now at 650.
All week, liberal web sites have been full of socially-conscious shopping tips about what brands may or may not be involved in corner-cutting third-world factories like the ones that ordered their workers back into a building whose walls were cracking. But that's a band-aid at best.
The fundamental problem here is that workers have no power. Without their jobs they'd be so desperately poor that going back into a crumbling factory seems less risky than standing up to their bosses. As long as that is true, all the incentives in the capitalist system work to circumvent the consciences of shoppers. The most "efficient" way for the system to deal with the current situation is not to improve safety, but to fool socially conscious consumers into thinking something is being done. The system will keep working on that "efficient" solution until it figures out a way to do it, because that's where the money is.
Just ask Walmart, whose greenwashing campaign is working great for the corporate image, even if it isn't doing much for the environment.
So sure, change your buying patterns in whatever way seems appropriate. But if you're doing that instead of pushing for worker rights, the corporate power structure thanks you.
Oh, and in case you think this is just a third-world problem, don't forget about the fertilizer factory explosion in West, Texas. We hear so much about the costs of government regulation, but the costs of non-regulation are even higher.
and Jason CollinsBasketball player Jason Collins became the first active professional athlete in a major American sport to announce he is gay. His article in Sports Illustrated talks about the pressure of hiding a major area of your life not just from the public, but from teammates as well.
Collins is a 12-season NBA veteran who has never been a star and seldom starts, but consistently fills a role a lot of teams need: a 7-footer who can come off the bench and provide defense and rebounding when your starting big guys are in foul trouble or need a rest. He played for the Celtics and Wizards last season and is currently a free agent. He is in his declining years as an athlete, but Nate Silver's comparisons to similar players in the past indicates there was a somewhat better than 50-50 chance he would have a job next season before his announcement. (So whether he gets signed next year is not necessarily proof of either prejudice or favoritism.)
Comparisons to Jackie Robinson are appropriate in some ways but not others. Robinson was a uniquely talented athlete whose statistics (compiled over only half a career, since he was kept out of the majors until age 28) could have put him in the Hall of Fame even without his off-the-field significance. Obviously, Collins is not in that class. And I'm sure Robinson would have had an easier time if he could have played 12 years in the majors and then announced he was black.
Still, Collins' announcement required courage. (Anyone who thinks it didn't needs to explain why no one has done it before.) He has made himself a symbol. Like Robinson, Collins will be cheered and booed for what he is, not who he is.
Some commenters clearly resent the fact that Collins is being cheered by many. There's an intentional cluelessness in Ben Shapiro's tweet: "So Jason Collins is a hero because he's gay?" What's striking, though, is the way such views are being rejected in neutral forums. Check out the comments on this anti-Collins editorial by a small-town Illinois sports editor.
Naturally, this popular rejection of bigotry is being spun as some kind of unfair discrimination against bigots. There's a name for that: privileged distress.
But the biggest significance of Collins' announcement (and the generally positive response) is on the many closeted gay athletes in high school and college, like the one profiled by Sunday by the Portland Press Herald.
But I wrote about sustainable economics
I reviewed the recent book Enough is Enough in Prosperity Without Growth?
and you also might be interested in ...
The observatory at the top of Mauna Loa in Hawaii is recording atmospheric carbon dioxide approaching 400 parts per million "for the first time in human history". The graph tells the story.
This re-emphasizes a point I've made before: When someone says they don't believe in global warming, or don't believe humans cause it, ask them which part of the argument they doubt. Here are the steps:
- Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. (Duh.)
- The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been going up more-or-less continuously since the Industrial Age got rolling. (That's this graph.)
- Atmospheric carbon dioxide warms the Earth through a greenhouse effect. (Infra-red radiation that would ordinarily dissipate into outer space gets reflected back to the planet surface.)
Given these rising carbon levels, which we can measure directly, global warming is what a rational person would expect. The argument against it needs to be a little stronger than just "maybe something else will happen".
The public got its first look at the George W. Bush Library this week. I had been hearing about the Decision Point Theater game, where visitors supposedly hear the kind of advice Bush got at some key point in his administration, then get to make a decision. Now we finally see what that looks like.
You know what it looks like? The whole Bush administration. The single thing most typical of Bush was his shameless spin -- rhetoric that made you think of one thing, but then if you challenged it as a lie, his people would explain that it was true because of something else entirely. So Saddam "supported international terrorist organizations" -- which was supposed to make you think he was helping Al Qaeda plan the next 9-11. But if you pushed back you'd hear about connections to Hamas or Abu Nidal, not Al Qaeda or Bin Laden. They'd talk about Al Qaeda affiliates "operating in Iraq", but if you pushed you'd find they were talking about a Kurdish zone Saddam had lost control of. And so on.
Bush is still spinning in exactly the same ways. Rachel Maddow shows clips from the DPT section on invading Iraq, calls BS on it, and then comments:
The case to invade Iraq was not "mistaken". The case to invade Iraq was cooked up. It was a hoax perpetrated on the American people. And they are still cooking it up, right now.
Here's one of those polls that makes you wonder if people really believe what they say. By a 44%-31% margin, Republicans agree with the statement "In the next few years, an armed rebellion might be necessary to protect our liberties." (Democrats disagree 61%-18%.)
If I actually believed that, I think I'd be doing more than just stockpiling assault rifles. (After all, the government has tanks and planes.) I'd for sure have my escape route out of the country planned and a stash of money at my planned destination. Are people really doing that kind of stuff? In large numbers? Or has answering polls become part of some big fantasy game?
If there's anyplace in America that might need an armed rebellion to maintain democracy, it's North Carolina. The Republican leadership in the legislature is so intent on getting rid of the state's renewable energy program that they declared victory in a voice vote and refused requests to have votes actually counted.
Mitch McConnell is catching on to this social-media thing. If your campaign video is getting as many hits as you want, you can buy the extra hits.
I often find myself telling non-religious people that right-wing Christians really aren't as bad as they think. Well, the science education at Blue Ridge Christian Academy in South Carolina is worse than you think.
It's been a heavy week. Let's end with some entertainment.