Monday, April 13, 2026

Accelerating Trends

The war has accelerated or made evident a trend that was already there, which is that the whole Trump administration is about a kind of rebalancing of power, so that we are less powerful and our rivals are more powerful.

- Timothy Snyder

There is no featured post this week.

Ongoing stories

  • Trump's assault on American democracy. The Hungarian election has no direct effect on the US, but Viktor Orbán's landslide defeat (after Trump and Vance pulled out all the tops to support him) has to worry the Trump regime. Orbán was the prototype, and he failed.
  • Climate change. The difficulty opening the Strait of Hormuz and the resulting $100-per-barrel oil should motivate more countries to transition away from fossil fuels.
  • Israel/Palestine. The focus of conflict has moved to Lebanon, where Israel is applying a tactic it used in Gaza: domicide, i.e., to "systematically destroy and damage civilian housing to render entire areas uninhabitable".
  • Ukraine. One winner from the Hungarian election is Ukraine. Orbán was Putin's man in the EU, and his objection was standing in the way of the EU making a 90 billion euro loan to Ukraine.
  • Epstein. The Iran War had gotten the Epstein scandal out of the headlines, but Melania put if back in. What was she thinking?

This week's developments

This week everybody was talking about the "peace" talks with Iran

One downside of taking a vacation is that I have missed my chance to say "I told you so" about the ceasefire and negotiations, because I did not in fact tell you so. During my vacation I told other people that Trump would announce a fake ceasefire, falsely claim that Iran had agreed to all kinds of concessions, and then resume the war when the reality became clear. But I have no written record to point to.

The reality is this: Trump badly miscalculated when he started this war. American air power can destroy anything it wants in Iran (other than the deeply buried uranium stocks), but it can't make the Iranians surrender.

Trump, though, lives an in alternate reality where his power is absolute. J. D. Vance's mission was doomed from the start because he went to Islamabad not to negotiate peace, but to dictate terms to an enemy Trump falsely insists is defeated. Vance explained his failure: "They have chosen not to accept our terms." Of course they wouldn't. As pummeled as Iran's military currently is, the nation is not defeated. Defeating them will require either hundreds of thousands of ground troops or a willingness to commit genocide.


Increasingly, however, Trump's alternate reality is being taken seriously in mainstream media. After Vance's entirely predictable failure, The Washington Post wrote:

The involvement of Vice President JD Vance had raised hopes around the world that the weekend negotiations in Pakistan would solidify the ceasefire with Iran and put an end to the war within reach.

Really? Bill Grueskin commented on BlueSky:

In what universe did this take place?

The WaPo article went on to describe Vance as "President Donald Trump’s most high-profile war skeptic", which is probably how Vance will try to pitch himself in 2028. But there is no evidence that his pre-war self-description as a "skeptic of foreign military interventions" actually resulted in any protest once Trump started bombing.


As many people have reported, Trump went into the war with his Venezuela adventure as a model: A quick decapitation strike would convince the new leaders to do whatever Trump wanted.

Trump understood the Venezuelan leaders, because fundamentally they are like him: They are interested primarily in their own wealth and power, so there is nothing they are willing to die for. Iran's leaders, on the other hand, are willing to lose everything including their lives. So Trump has no idea how to deal with them.

So Trump's latest idea is to blockade the Strait of Hormuz himself. He didn't like the idea that Iran could profit by charging tolls on the Strait, so he's going to block everything, no matter what that does to the price of oil. And that would make sense if the Iranian leaders were motivated by profit the way Trump is. But they're not, so Trump is essentially doing their job for them: Iran intended to disrupt the world economy by driving up the price of oil, and now Trump is helping them do it.

In a few days it will be clear that this move didn't work either, so Trump will go back to threatening to kill Iran's "whole civilization".


Two points:

  • Ending a country's "civilization" is a war crime. And since the world does not recognize a Nuremberg defense ("I was just following orders"), Trump will be involving members of the American military in war crimes. If anyone you care about is in the military, this should worry you.
  • Like Netanyahu before him, Trump has fallen for the fallacy that if your opponent is evil, you can't become the bad guy. But you can. Hamas is certainly evil, but nonetheless Netanyahu became the bad guy in the Gaza War. The Iranian regime is likewise evil. But if Trump's unprovoked attack on Iran turns genocidal, he will be the bad guy.

For a high-level view of the Iran War and its place in geo-political strategy, I recommend listening to an hour-long conversation between Timothy Snyder (author of On Tyranny) and Phillips O'Brien (author of War and Power). That's where the quote at the top comes from.

One scary conclusion they come to: The Iran War proves we would lose a non-nuclear war with China over Taiwan. Modern war is less about the big, expensive systems the US military is based on and more about manufacturing large numbers of cheap drones and similar devices. In World War II, the US was "the arsenal of democracy", because we could manufacture planes, tanks, ships, and other munitions in larger quantities than anyone else. We've lost that edge. In the Iran War, we are firing advanced munitions like Tomahawk and Patriot missiles many times faster than we can build them.

Conversely, if you want to manufacture large numbers of things quickly today, where do you go? China. In a war with China, if we couldn't win in a week, we would run out of weapons and lose.


Snyder and O'Brien both like the nonprofit foundation Come Back Alive, which supplies the Ukrainian military. As they describe it, CBA connects what the Ukrainians need to garage-level workshops that make drones and anti-drone tech. Their tech evolves constantly and is currently some of the best in the world.

and Hungary

The model for Trump's Project 2025 and his overall attempt to strangle American democracy has been what Viktor Orbán did in Hungary: change election laws to favor his party, get legal immunity from a corrupt judiciary, use government power to push the media into friendly hands, turn the universities away from objective scholarship into pro-government propaganda vehicles, tame big business through corrupt government regulating and contracting, and so forth.

The goal, at least immediately, is not a Hitler/Stalin style dictatorship where political opponents can be killed at will or arrested and sent to concentration camps. Instead, the government establishes a soft autocracy that maintains the appearance of freedom and democracy, but stacks the deck in ways that prevent the formation of any effective opposition. Vox sums up:

The basic goal was to create a system where the government doesn’t have to formally rig elections, in the sense of stuffing ballot boxes. It could generally rely on the background unfairness of the system, the structural disadvantages opposition parties face, to reliably maintain a constitutional majority. Political scientists call this kind of regime “competitive authoritarianism” — a system in which elections are real, but so unfair that they can’t reasonably be termed democratic contests.

... The result of all this has been a remarkably durable authoritarian system. In the 2014 and 2018 elections, Fidesz [i.e., Orbán's party] managed to retain its two-thirds majority in parliament with less than half of the national popular vote. In 2022, the various opposition parties united around a single candidate and party list to try and overcome its structural disadvantages — and Fidesz actually improved its vote share, easily retaining its two-thirds majority.

The flaw in that model is that if the public gets sufficiently united against the government, the official thumb on the scale might not be heavy enough.

Sunday, Hungarians took advantage of what power they have left to oust Orbán. After 16 years in power, his party was decisively swept out. The opposition has won a 2/3rds supermajority in Parliament, which is big enough to undo the constitutional changes Orbán made.

I happened to be in Budapest Thursday, on a tour I arranged last fall without any journalistic motive. I don't speak Hungarian and had little opportunity to talk to the locals, but I did see the election posters dominating every flat surface, and workmen setting up for a huge opposition concert Friday. I worried about a violent outcome to the election, so I was not sorry to get out before the action started.

and the astronauts

Sadly, the Artemis II mission all but vanished from the headlines. I'm showing my age here, but I remember when the whole nation was transfixed by each new space flight. One of the few things my grandfather and I were both interested in was watching the countdown for John Glenn's launch. In school, we took time out of class to watch an unmanned mission that did nothing more than stick a TV camera onto a rocket and slam it into the Moon.

The four astronauts of Artemis II looped around the Moon, went farther from Earth than any human ever has, and successfully returned to Earth on Friday.

and you also might be interested in ...

The week's most mysterious story is why Melania called a news conference to read a statement saying that she was not connected to Jeffrey Epstein. She was not responding to anything obvious in the news cycle, so her main accomplishment was to start people wondering whether what she is denying is actually true.

New York magazine speculates:

The most logical explanation: The First Lady is trying to get ahead of forthcoming story about her ties to Epstein. But there are no specific rumors about such a story circulating on social media; it’s all just conjecture based on Melania’s statement.

But The Guardian's Arwa Mahdawi offers a simpler theory:

I have another possible explanation. And that is that the Trumps aren’t just morally bankrupt, they’re also very, very stupid. A lot of people seem reluctant to acknowledge this about the president; they will tie themselves into knots trying to argue that his erratic actions actually represent a genius playing four-dimensional chess. He’s not really a madman, they insist, he’s just playing one on Truth Social! I understand why people want to believe this: it’s comforting to think there’s some sort of method behind the madness. But if there is any sort of method, I certainly can’t see it. All I can see is a man who thinks he can bully his way through life.

Here’s the thing: even if you are blessed with “a very high IQ”, when you are as rich and powerful as the Trumps, you can easily lose perspective. People rarely say “no” to you. Your employees don’t tell you that your ideas are ridiculous because they don’t want to lose their jobs. Melania may not be the president, but she is in the same sycophantic bubble as her husband. It’s possible she just thought she could hold a press conference and command all us plebs to stop talking about her, and we would immediately obey.

It's hard to top The Onion's take on this: "Melania Trump Slams Baseless Reports Linking Her To Wrong Wealthy Pedophile".


US Congressman and recent top contender to be the next governor of California Eric Swalwell has been accused of sexual misconduct by at least four women so far. He has denied the accusations, but a Democrat can't ride something like this out the way Republicans can. He has suspended his campaign for governor, and I'll be surprised if he hangs on to the House seat.

I'm always amazed by candidates who imagine something like this won't come out. How do you recruit people to spend two years or more trying to get you elected, when you know that something you've done could result in all their effort being wasted?


As Congress returns to work, there is still no plan to fund DHS, and Trump really wants action on the vote-suppressing SAVE Act.


The regime revealed plans for Trump's "arch of victory" monument, which is planned to be 250 feet tall. This motivated The Contrarian's Tim Dickinson to review all the things Trump wants to name after himself.

All this self-aggrandizement is futile. As soon as he's gone, everything he's done will be reversed. The Kennedy Center will be the Kennedy Center again. Trump class battleships will never be built. The White House ballroom will be repurposed and renamed.

As for the money he's planning to add his signature to, I think we can shame him out of it. You can get little stamping pads to add comments to currency. I think every Trump dollar should have "is America's worst president" added to it.

Remember what Conan O'Brien said at the Oscars: "Welcome back, we are coming to you live from the Has a Small Penis Theater! Let’s see him put his name in front of that."

and let's close with something far out

The Artemis II crew got some new views of the Earth and the Moon. Here we see how everything is relative: the Earth setting over the Moon looks tiny.

Monday, March 23, 2026

Not a Game

No sifts for two weeks. The next new articles will appear April 13.

In the dramatic circumstances of war ... the media must guard against the risk of becoming propaganda. ... It is up to you to show the sufferings that war always brings to the people; to show the face of war and to relate it through the eyes of the victims, so as not to transform it into a videogame.

- Pope Leo XIV

This week's featured post is "Notes on yet another week of war".

Errata: Last week I did a particularly bad job as my own editor: I was fooled by a post apparently by the Stryker Corp IT chief, which was actually satire. (The community notes on X now say so explicitly.) The satirist posts a lot of imaginary inner monologues of tech company officials. They're entertaining and occasionally insightful, but they're not real. I also misspelled James Talarico's name (two weeks in a row). And there were assorted typos that commenters pointed out.

Ongoing stories

  • Trump's assault on American democracy. The Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM) Institute in Sweden maintains a "Liberal Democracy Index" to measure the overall level of democracy in the countries of the world. The US LDI rating has dropped precipitously in the last year to 57, just behind Ghana (61), tied with Panama, and just ahead of Columbia (52). Most other NATO countries are somewhere in the 70s or 80s, where the US was in the Obama years. V-DEM's annual report notes "The speed with which American democracy is currently dismantled is unprecedented in modern history." Putin, Orban, and similar autocrats took much longer to unmake their democracies.
  • Climate change. If you worry about the impact of burning a tank of gasoline in your car, imagine how much damage is done by burning a whole tanker or a depot or setting a gas field on fire. In the long run, the Iran War raises the price of gas and points out the unreliability of fossil fuel supplies, which will push more people, corporations, and countries towards renewable energy. But the short-term impact is horrifying.
  • Israel/Palestine. The eyes of the world have mostly moved on, but NPR looks at Gaza during the Eid holiday. It observes that about 200 truckloads of aid get through Israeli checkpoints each day, when 600 are needed. Most of Gaza's 2 million people "live in makeshift tents and rely on aid for survival". Meanwhile, Israel is expanding its settlements in the West Bank "confining the Palestinian population to smaller and smaller patches of land".
  • Ukraine. As winter ends, Russia is starting a new offensive and incurring large losses. The war in Iran works in Russia's favor, as it is able to sell more oil at higher prices.
  • Epstein. The House Oversight Committee that is investigating the Epstein affair has subpoenaed AG Pam Bondi. Bondi announced a briefing for the lawmakers, but indicated she saw this as a replacement for testifying under oath. Democrats on the committee were having none of this and walked out. The deadline for the subpoena is April 14. So the cover-up continues.

This week's developments

This week everybody was talking about Iran

The Iran War is the subject of the featured post. What didn't get covered there is the $200 billion supplemental appropriation the Trump regime is seeking to fund the war. The official request hasn't been made yet, and getting it through Congress can only happen if it is part of a reconciliation package that circumvents filibuster rules in the Senate. Given Republicans' narrow margin in the House, it may not even pass there.

Politically, the best thing for Democrats would be the Republicans passing the appropriation on a party-line vote. At that point, they own the war, and every spending cut Republicans want can be compared to it. "Why was there no money to keep your local hospital open, when there was $200 billion to blow hospitals up in Iran? Why is there no money for cancer research when there is plenty to fight foreign wars?" And so on.

But for the nation, the best thing would be to get this thing stopped any way we can. Democrats can't do that on their own, though. That's what being in the minority means.

and the strange case of Joe Kent

Opponents of both the Gaza and Iran Wars have faced the same challenge: How do you denounce what the Israeli government does without making common cause with antisemites? For centuries, conspiracy theories have been tracing every unfortunate situation back to some nefarious plot by Jews. But sane people should not get involved in that project. While Netanyahu and his buddies are responsible for plenty of wrongdoing, they are not the cause of all the world's problems.

This week delivered a case in point: Joe Kent. Kent is a twice-defeated Republican congressional candidate who failed up: Tulsi Gabbard got him a job as head of the National Counter-Terrorism Center. This week he became the first Trump insider to resign in protest over the Iran War. In the message that accompanied his resignation letter on X, Kent said

Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation,

So far so good, but the sentence didn't stop there.

and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.

Vox' Zack Beauchamp acknowledges that he ought to welcome defections within the Trump war machine, but ...

Kent’s resignation should not be celebrated by principled critics of the Iran war, but rather serve as a cautionary tale for how a just cause could be hijacked by extremists to promote something awful.

Kent's particular awful thing is to portray an American president as nothing more than the dupe of sinister Jews.

Trump and MAGA did not fail in Iran, in Kent’s view; they were betrayed by the same dark forces that have been corrupting American foreign policy for the entire 21st century. And given the corner of far-right politics Kent hails from, it should be fairly clear what religion those dark forces represent.

At the moment, most MAGA fascists are supporting the war whole-heartedly.

But if this war continues to go poorly, public opinion will turn — much in the same way as many Republicans now view President George W. Bush’s war in Iraq as an obvious mistake. In such a future, Republican voters will be looking for someone to tell them why their president led them astray. Kent’s letter is setting up an obvious scapegoat: the Jews. ... Kent’s letter, then, is not really a sign of rising Republican resistance to the Iran war that could augur its premature end. Rather, it is an opening salvo in a future political war over how the war’s (likely) failure should be interpreted — and an extremely ugly one at that.

I'm going to repeat a message that I've posted many times before: Americans should not bring the troubles of the Middle East home. American Jews who support the idea of Israel because they believe there should be a Jewish refuge somewhere in the world are not the same as Netanyahu's fascists. And American Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims who believe Palestinians also deserve a homeland are not the same as Hamas. Americans should not be persecuting or even killing other Americans because of their resemblance to overseas villains.

and ICE

Trump claims that today he will start sending ICE agents to help TSA at airports. Mark Jacob points out the obvious: This has nothing to do with ICE's stated mission.

Trump's plan to send ICE to the airports makes it clear that ICE isn't really an immigration enforcement force. It's Trump's personal Gestapo, his goon squad ready to act out the dictator's fever dreams, no matter how reckless and stupid.

If he can send them wherever he wants to do whatever he wants, why wouldn't he send them to polling places in November to intimidate non-white voters?

Ron Filipkowski asks another obvious question: Will ICE agents at the airports wear masks?

BBC doesn't sanewash the president's plan, describing it as a "threat". When you quote him more completely, it does sound that way:

I will move our brilliant and patriotic ICE Agents to the Airports where they will do Security like no one has ever seen before.

ICE agents behaving "like no one has ever seen before" is exactly what travelers should fear.


Republicans know that it looks bad for them when ICE agents murder American citizens in the streets and suffer no consequences. So they want to soften their rhetoric and present a more pleasant image. But the underlying thuggishness of ICE isn't changing. Replacing Kristi Noem with Markwayne Mullin is just a change of figurehead at DHS. Stephen Miller still runs the show, and he likes the thugs.

If congressional Republicans really wanted a course correction at DHS, they have a straightforward opportunity without changing its leadership. The agency has been shutdown since Feb. 14, when Democrats refused to support legislation funding the agency because it lacked provisions reforming ICE. The list of demands in their counterproposal is straightforward. ICE agents would be required to wear identification badges and work without masks, and follow existing laws regarding warrants. They would also be banned from targeting people based on race. The GOP’s refusal to rein in the rogue agency even a little shows that the party does not want to “course correct” in any meaningful way.

Brian Beutler sees this as nothing more than an across-the-board plan to save Republicans in the midterms:

They now seem to be tacking back a subtler approach. Not just because they think they’ll get a second chance at authoritarian breakthrough, but because the nature of their conduct over the past 14 months has rendered the whole project politically toxic. What they want, therefore, is to freeze their progress in place, dialing back the braggadocio, in the hope that voters sense the atmospheric differences between March 2025 and March 2026 and assume the worst is behind them. In other words, they are hoping to salvage power through a change in rhetorical emphasis, without substantively backtracking.

Trump still calls the shots for the GOP in Congress, and he opposes "any deal with the Crazy, Country Destroying, Radical Left Democrats". The deal apparently on the table would lead to no changes at ICE, but would make Republicans fully own ICE's rogue behavior: Democrats would vote to fund all of DHS other than ICE, while ICE funding would be part of a reconciliation bill that would be immune to filibuster.

To me, even the Democrats' demands aren't enough. At the very minimum, I want to see charges filed against the agents who murdered Rene Good and Alex Pretti. Until that happens, ICE's thugs will go on assuming they have a 007-like license to kill.


ICE has illegally been taking DNA samples from protesters it arrests. "It's very concerning to me because what it looks like the government is doing is creating this catalog of political dissidents." DHS hasn't said what it does with this information.

and law

The Trump administration had another bad week in court.

A federal judge blocked the Pentagon's restrictive rules on the press and restored the press passes of seven NYT Pentagon reporters.

They had surrendered those passes in October instead of signing the policy, which empowered the Pentagon to declare journalists “security risks” and revoke their press passes if they engaged in any conduct that the Pentagon believed threatened national security. In his 40-page ruling, Judge Friedman wrote that the Pentagon’s policy rewarded reporters who were “willing to publish only stories that are favorable to or spoon-fed by department leadership.”

Siding with an argument advanced by The Times, Judge Friedman added that the Pentagon had given itself too much power to enforce its new rules. The policy also violates journalists’ due process rights under the Fifth Amendment, he said, writing that it “provides no way for journalists to know how they may do their jobs without losing their credentials.”


According to Law Dork, third-country removals -- deportations to someplace other than the deportee's home country -- is one of Trump regime's "most dramatic anti-immigrant policies". I invite you to think about what an extreme punishment this is: Imagine being dropped into a country you know nothing about, possibly a war-torn country like Sudan. You have no friends there and you may not speak the local language. You don't know what rights (if any) the local system grants you. Even if you aren't immediately imprisoned, you are in rough shape: You have no job and no prospect of getting one.

In its Wednesday post, LD gives a good summary of where the case to restrain these deportations stands: A district court has been trying to rein in this practice, and recently issued its final opinion -- not an injunction or any similar temporary judgment.

[Judge Brian] Murphy has ordered the Trump administration to provide people with “meaningful“ due process before carrying out third country removals.

Trump's DoJ took that ruling to the First Circuit appellate court, which put a stay on the lower court's order while they consider the merits of the case. That stay allows third-country removals to continue temporarily, but LD interprets this as possibly a strategic move by one of the Biden appointees who might ultimately want to affirm the lower-court ruling.

Looking at this strategically, in light of the Supreme Court’s prior shadow docket order, the stay grant prevented the case from going to the Supreme Court now — allowing the First Circuit to fully consider these questions and issue a full merits ruling before this important case goes back up to the Supreme Court.

Instead, the First Circuit is going to hear this case quickly, with briefs and oral arguments finished in April.


RFK Jr.'s reign of error at Health and Human Services got bad news from the courts on two fronts.

  • Just about everything RFK Jr. has done to discourage vaccine use got thrown out by the same Judge Murphy.
  • A different federal judge set aside HHS's declaration that gender-affirming care "is neither safe nor effective as a treatment modality for gender dysphoria, gender incongruence, or other related disorders in minors."

Both rulings make similar arguments: There are legal ways to change HHS policy, but Kennedy circumvented them.

The vaccine ruling revolves around the role of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which is supposed to be a board of scientific experts on vaccines. Back in June, Kennedy fired the entire committee, which he subsequently replaced with hacks who agree with him. Judge Murphy noted that of ACIP's 15 current members "only six appear to have any meaningful experience in vaccines". This violates the legislation that established ACIP and numerous laws that refer to it.

HHS, sometimes with the advice of the new unqualified ACIP and sometimes without, changed childhood vaccination schedules and made other vaccine-related rulings -- all pointing in the direction of Americans receiving fewer vaccinations. These moves also violated various laws, including the Administrative Procedures Act.

The ruling blocks these changes to HHS vaccine policy and bars ACIP from continuing to meet in its current form.

HHS' gender-affirming care declaration not only prevents federal funds from being used to provide such care, but threatened the institutions that provide it.

In the weeks after Mr. Kennedy issued his written declaration, the Department of Health and Human Services indicated that it would investigate institutions that continued to prescribe medication to minors for gender transitions and would potentially bar them from receiving federal Medicare and Medicaid funds. (As an aside, the declaration re-names "gender-affirming care" as "sex-rejecting procedures". )

The court ruling prevents HHS from enforcing its new policy. HHS will undoubtedly appeal.


The National Trust for Historic Preservation is suing to stop construction of Trump's massive White House ballroom until the project gets congressional approval and submits to the ordinary review process. Verbal comments by the judge in this case have observers speculating that he will side with NTHP when he rules later this month.

and Robert Mueller

The death of Robert Mueller at age 81 provides a news hook for renewed discussion of what Mueller investigated: Trump's ties to Russia. Certainly Trump himself sees the connection:

Robert Mueller just died. Good, I’m glad he’s dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people!

(Remember all the handwringing about "civility" when liberals weren't sufficiently deferential about Charlie Kirk's death?) But certainly Trump is not one of those "innocent people". Marcy Wheeler reviews the convictions Mueller's Russia investigation led to, and points to the pardons of key figures that kept Mueller from fully uncovering the Trump/Russia conspiracy.

Mueller’s failure, solidified by Democrats’ failure to do anything with the impeachment referral, to thwart Trump’s betrayal of the United States is one of many aspects of a larger lesson that the US legal system was not built to hold a corrupt President accountable. Impeachment does not work, and even before John Roberts gave Trump a retrospective and prospective Get Out of Jail Free card, Presidents had too much power to tamper in investigations of their own crimes.

and the Illinois primary

Tuesday, Illinois held primaries for both parties. It's a blue state, so the big news was on the Democratic side. Several races were interpreted in the media as progressive/moderate races, with moderates doing somewhat better. But there was not a clear trend. Illinois does not have a run-off rule, so several multi-candidate races were won with less than 50% of the vote.

The top of the ticket was the race to replace retiring Dick Durbin in the Senate. (Side note: I was living in New Hampshire during the 2008 primary campaign. The Obama victory party was supposed to be upstairs from my favorite brew-pub, but Obama was surprisingly defeated by Hillary Clinton. I was in the pub for dinner, went to the bar for some reason, and noticed I was standing next to Dick Durbin. I let him mourn in peace.) Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton won with 40%.

Another noteworthy race was for the 9th congressional district. I was rooting for Kat Abughazaleh, but Evanston Mayor David Biss performed well during the ICE focus on the Chicago area, so I was not sorry to see him win. The big loser in this race was AIPAC, which put a lot of money behind the third-place candidate.

The somewhat better showing of moderates touched off the usual debate about which direction the Democratic Party should go, with many voices pushing for what Matt Yglesias calls "popularism": backing away from unpopular positions. Unfortunately, this is generally interpreted to mean throwing trans people under the bus. I have trouble seeing how this actually works in practice. Harris never mentioned trans issues during the 2024 fall campaign, but that didn't save her because she had supported the trans community in the past.

About the only way this can work is to do what my congressman, Seth Moulton, did: repeat anti-trans talking points yourself. (He's running for the Senate now, and I will not be voting for him in the primary against incumbent Ed Markey.) Even that probably won't work, because your Republican opponent can always make a more extreme anti-trans attack and dare you to match him.

I'm struck by how seldom the same popularist point is made to Republicans about issues like abortion. At most, Republicans are told to soften their rhetoric, not change their position (that abortion should be illegal in nearly all situations, often including ones that endanger a pregnant woman's health). Chair Richard Hudson of the National Republican Congressional Committee told Punchbowl News:

Republicans don’t have a policy problem. We have a branding problem.

Their policy is that a woman who is raped should be forced to bear her rapist's child. In other words, rape should be a viable male reproductive strategy; if you're having trouble attracting women, you can still propagate your genes by force.

Republicans think they can win the issue by painting Democrats as even more out-of-step with the public than Republicans are.

We need to point out that the Democrat position is abortion for any reason, up until the moment of birth, paid for by taxpayers.

But that's hardly any Democrat's real position. Not that the truth actually matters.


Here's my take on where most voters are: They generally dislike abortions and wish the US had fewer of them. But if someone in their family needs one, they don't want the government to tell them they can't get one.

Coincidentally, I think most voters have exactly the same opinion about guns.

and you also might be interested in ...

CBS started broadcasting news on the radio in 1927. It will stop in May.


TPM collects what is known so far about the DHS contracting scandal. The gist: DHS funds big projects through dummy general contractors who then farm the work out to politically connected sub-contractors. This, plus a few other gimmicks, circumvents the usual government contracting process -- which is cumbersome but designed to prevent exactly this kind of corruption.


Republican rhetoric about the SAVE Act started as painting the bill as common-sense, nothing-to-see-here. But as it looks increasingly unlikely to get through the Senate, they are revving up evidence-free conspiracy theories about noncitizen voting.

The Contrarian calls out "The Voter Fraud Fraud".

The accusation that there is rampant cheating in our election is dramatic, alarming, and oft-repeated. It is also totally false.

After years of audits, recounts, lawsuits, academic studies, and investigations across red states and blue states alike, there is absolutely no evidence—zero—that substantial, outcome-changing voter fraud is present in American elections. There simply isn’t proof.

It turns out that the real fraud is not at the ballot box; it’s claims like the one the president made as he addressed a joint session of Congress.

If I were a Democrat in a general-election debate with a Republican, I'd want to ask this question: "Do any of your proposals address a problem that actually exists?"


The Idaho House has passed another transgender persecution bill. This one makes it a misdemeanor to "knowingly and willfully enter a restroom or changing room ... designated for use by the opposite biological sex". First offense can get you a year in prison, while the second offense can get you five.

Idaho is not alone.

Earlier this year, Kansas passed a bill that mass-invalidated transgender people's driver's licenses and created a bathroom bounty hunter system across the state. Missouri then advanced three anti-transgender bathroom bills in a single night.

OK, I see how this makes life more difficult for transfolk. But how does it make life better for the rest of us? What problem do such bills solve?

Accept for the moment that transgender and nonbinary people exist. (Off the top of my head I can think of three that I've met personally. I wouldn't be surprised if there are others that I haven't noticed.) So picture a person with a female birth certificate who now presents as male, to the point that you really can't tell unless you stare. Like all humans, that person may need a public bathroom from time to time. Which is more disruptive?

  • Going into the men's bathroom and using a stall.
  • Going into the women's bathroom looking like a man.

I think the answer is obvious. Idaho's law is mandating the more disruptive outcome. So the point isn't to make society work more smoothly. The point is to persecute trans people.


This weekend, the US oil blockade of Cuba caused the third nationwide blackout in the last month. The Trump administration is punishing the Cuban people in hopes that they will rise up against their government. The blackouts are particularly hard on Cuba's hospitals.


Trump's concentration of lies seems to be rising. This post must be some kind of record:

FREE TINA PETERS, A 73-YEAR-OLD WOMAN, WITH CANCER, GIVEN A NINE YEAR DEATH SENTENCE IN A COLORADO PRISON BY DEMOCRAT GOVERNOR, JARED POLIS, AND A CORRUPT POLITICAL MACHINE, FOR EXPOSING FRAUD BY THE DEMOCRATS IN THE 2020 ELECTION.

Kyle Clark finds four false claims in those 40 words:

Peters is 70 (not 73), does not have cancer, was sentenced by a judge in Mesa County (not the Governor), and did not expose fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

and let's close with something youthful

If this week's news has been raising your anxiety, spend a couple of minutes watching a puppy and a kitten get acquainted.

Monday, March 16, 2026

Pathocracy

The transition to pathocracy begins when a disordered individual emerges as a leader figure. While some members of the ruling class are appalled by the brutality and irresponsibility of the leader and his acolytes, his disordered personality appeals to some psychologically normal individuals. They find him charismatic. His impulsiveness is mistaken for decisiveness; his narcissism for confidence; his recklessness for fearlessness.

- Steve Taylor, "The Problem of Pathocracy"

This week's featured post is "The Longer View", where three articles try to answer the question "What's wrong with those people in the Trump administration?"

Ongoing stories

This week I didn't have the time and energy to look at the ongoing stories I usually keep track of. I'll try to do better next week.

This week's developments

This week everybody was still talking about Iran

I don't think I need to say a lot about the progress of the war: The US and Israel continue to blow things up in Iran and in Lebanon, and while Iranian casualties are far larger than ours, we're still getting our own people killed. And they're dying for some goal that seems to exist only in Trump's inarticulate mind. He certainly hasn't figured out a way to explain it to the rest of us.

As the cartoon indicates, even though everyday Americans are largely insulted from the killing (at least until the next big terrorist attack), the war has significant effects everyone can see: immediately, higher gas prices, and down the road, higher prices overall.

Trump appears to have thought through none of this. Articles about how the go-to-war decision got made are largely based on anonymous sources, so they're not as reliable as I'd like. But they do all paint a similar picture: Trump imagined his Iran attack going like Venezuela: He'd take out the country's leadership, and the next leaders would be so intimidated they'd cooperate with whatever plan he came up with. It would all be over in a few days.

No one else thought it would go that way, including a lot of folks inside the administration. What has happened since was easily predictable: Iran's theocratic leadership would take a next-man-up approach. The next leader would face the prospect of martyrdom with the same dispassion the last leader did and would refuse to surrender. Iran would attack US allies in the region with missiles and drones, and they would shut the Strait of Hormuz, jacking up world oil prices.

But in his second administration, Trump has surrounded himself with opportunists, weaklings, and cowards. No one is willing to lose his job to save the country from some wrong-headed notion that gets into the Great Leader's head. So: We're at war, gas prices are high and rising, overall inflation will start rising soon, victory remains undefined, and the Iranian regime is as entrenched as ever. We face the prospect of either stopping our attack without any lasting accomplishment, or significantly escalating the war with either ground troops or nuclear weapons.


So far, I haven't heard anyone in the administration talk specifically about nuclear weapons, so my mention of them in the previous paragraph may seem unwarranted.

But I worry about them anyway. As I've said before, Trump has only two ways of dealing with opposition: buy them off or intimidate them. If opponents refuse to be intimidated, he makes a series of ever more extreme threats -- which he is then on the spot to carry out.

We're already running low on conventional munitions, so Trump's threats to hit Iran "20 times harder" if they don't surrender are mostly empty -- unless he goes to nukes. I have trouble picturing him backing down on his threats, given what he's said in the past, and I also don't trust the people around him to tell him no.


Wednesday, Iran flexed its cyber-terrorism muscle. The Iranian hacker group Handala somehow got high-level privileges on the network of medical device maker Stryker. At the very least, the attack will delay delivery of devices. But it raises the possibility of homocidal mischief in the future.

Chillingly, Stryker's chief of IT emphasizes that nothing went wrong on the technical side:

I build the robots that perform your surgery. The defibrillators that restart your heart. The systems that let your nurse find your doctor at three in the morning when something goes wrong. Twenty-five billion dollars a year. Fifty-six thousand employees. Sixty-one countries. Every device in every country, managed from one console.

On March 11th, someone who was not me sat down at that console and erased everything. I should be precise. They did not hack us. They logged in. ... My security tool did not fail. It performed exactly as designed. It wiped every device it was told to wipe, without error, on schedule. The architect of my destruction was my own IT budget line item. The command went out. The devices obeyed.


The man who rammed his vehicle into a synagogue in Michigan quite likely was motivated by learning that four of his family members had been killed in Lebanon by an Israel bombing raid. He was wrong to do what he did, and it is fortunate no one died but the perpetrator. But it's not hard for me to imagine being in that situation and feeling like the only conceivable response is to kill someone.


Saturday, Trump asked other countries to help clean up his mess.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump called on the UK, China, France, Japan, South Korea and other countries to send ships to the waterway, the world’s busiest shipping route, which is being violently blockaded by Iran. In his post, Trump alleged that “many countries, especially those who are affected by Iran’s attempted closure of the Hormuz strait, will be sending war ships, in conjunction with the United States of America, to keep the strait open and safe”.

In a later post, Trump extended his call to all “the countries of the world that receive oil through the Hormuz strait” to send naval support.

But countries are not exactly jumping up to volunteer.

German chancellor Friedrich Merz’s spokesperson, Stefan Kornelius, underlined that “it is not Nato’s war. Nato is an alliance to defend the alliance area.”

The time to look for allies is before you start a war, not after. Trump is like the guy who starts a bar fight nobody else wanted without giving his buddies any warning, but then expects them to come fight on his side.


Josh Marshall asked the same question I've been wondering about: Why do oil markets respond to what Trump says, when so much of what he says is nonsense?


Most of us are losers in this war, but there are a few winners: Putin and the major oil companies. But some people and countries are less vulnerable to oil prices, because they invested in renewable energy and electric vehicles, both of which Trump has discouraged in the US.

and the law

Courts have been proving troublesome to the Trump administration.

Friday, a judge unsealed an opinion quashing subpoenas in the investigation of Fed chair Jerome Powell. The investigation appears to be nothing more than an effort to harass Powell into doing what Trump wants: lowering interest rates. The US attorney's brief in support of the subpoenas vaguely asserts that cost overruns in renovations at the Fed might be due to fraud, and that testimony Powell gave to Congress might be false. No further specifics are given.

After the opinion was released, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro went on a rant about "activist judges". But

The striking thing about the brief, and about Pirro’s press conference, in fact, is that neither seems remotely concerned with establishing that there is a predicate for a criminal investigation at all. ... [N]either shows any awareness that investigative agencies aren’t supposed to initiate criminal investigations at all without an appropriate evidentiary predicate.

In her rant, Pirro "said she was willing to see acquittals and willing to see grand juries reject her proposed indictments". Grand juries used to almost never reject the government's attempts to indict someone. But now they regularly do, because the government pursues so many indictments purely to harass Trump's enemies.


Lawfare examines proposals circulating in administration circles for Trump to declare a national emergency to take control of the fall elections. Unsurprisingly, such an order would likely be illegal.


While the SAVE Act appears blocked in the Senate, Florida has passed its own version, which Gov. DeSantis is expected to sign:

Under the new law, a voter registration applicant’s citizenship status must be verified by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Until that happens, an applicant will be registered as an unverified voter and must vote with a provisional ballot that will not be counted if his or her legal status as a citizen cannot be verified through the department’s records.

The law doesn’t just impact new registrations. It also requires the Florida Department of State to verify the citizenship status of all registered voters who have not already been verified as U.S. citizens. If the citizenship status of a registered voter cannot be established or the voter record does not indicate that the registered voter’s citizenship is verified, the department must notify local election officials, who then notify the registered voter.

Unless courts intervene, we can expect chaos in Florida in November.


Remember all those people claiming that ICE agents were randomly rounding up brown people because they had arrest quotas to meet? A wild, crazy accusation, right?

Well, now some ICE agents have been interviewed under oath, and it turns out they were supposed to make eight arrests a day. They found people to arrest using a custom AI-app that made a lot of mistakes. And this part is beyond parody:

JB said the team decided to follow the van once it departed, even though officers didn’t confirm whether the driver of the van was, in fact, the registered owner of the vehicle. JB found it suspicious that the driver was making multiple stops for passengers, saying: “You don’t know if it’s human trafficking or smuggling.” The fact that the occupants were “only speaking Spanish” during the stop seemed to “confirm” there was smuggling or “harboring people that are not supposed to be here in the United States”, JB said.

It was a car pool, taking farm workers to their worksite. But

JB’s team pulled over a van of farm workers heading to their job early in the morning, smashed the car windows and detained all seven occupants.

One of them, a plaintiff in the suit that resulted in this deposition, had entered the US legally. But she

was taken to a detention center in Washington state before ICE released her “without explanation and left her to find her own way back home to Oregon”.


Princeton law Professor Deborah Pearlstein explains how the Trump administration is trying to make it OK for its lawyers to lie in court.

Under the proposed rule, the attorney general could ask any independent disciplinary authority to suspend ethics proceedings against a Justice Department lawyer (on threat of unspecified enforcement action) and send the matter to the department’s Office of Professional Responsibility. But a review by that office is not a serious substitute for a state bar investigation. Even before Mr. Trump, the office, which answers to a political appointee, had a reputation for operating like a black hole, with the details of investigative findings almost never made public.

and trans people

The effort to demonize and dehumanize the trans community continues.

So, most but not all states allow you to change or choose the gender marker on your driver's license. Blocking that is one level of discrimination, but the state of Kansas has taken it a step further: They retroactively cancelled any license where the gender had been changed while it was legal to do so: 1700 of them in all.

Hundreds of trans drivers already received letters from the state informing them their documents were “invalid immediately” and they “may be subject to additional penalties” if they continue to drive, unless they surrender the license to the Kansas Division of Vehicles and receive a new one with their birth sex.

Does forcing the gender on a drivers license to match the one on the corresponding birth certificate solve any problem? Let's think about what drivers licenses are for and how they're used. It makes perfect sense for states to want to keep track of who can drive on their roads and to impose standards to disqualify unsafe drivers. In addition, drivers licenses get used as an commonly available form of ID.

Why is gender on a license at all? Like height and eye color and the picture, it helps verify that you really are the licensed person. But if your appearance corresponds to a different gender than the one on your license, that actually makes the license less useful as ID. Worse, it sets you up for discrimination and abuse: Anyone who has a legitimate reason to ask for your license now knows that you're trans.

Now think about situations where you might show your drivers license. Is there any reason why a policeman or a cashier or anybody else needs to know what gender is on your birth certificate? I can't think of one. So this law solves absolutely zero problems.

All it does is harass trans people and expose them to discrimination and abuse. The only motive Kansas had to pass this law was to encourage such discrimination and abuse.


Last week, I talked about how the Supreme Court only takes "sincerely held religious beliefs" seriously if they are conservative religious beliefs about topics like abortion or gender.

Example: On March 2, the Court set aside a California law that prevents schools from telling parents about a student's change in gender presentation without the student's permission. The Court said the law prevents parents from implementing their sincerely held beliefs in the religious upbringing of their children.

It remains to be seen whether teachers and school districts who keep a child's confidences will be held liable in some way. If a child ever confided some deep issue to me and asked me not to tell their parents, I would hope that my first response would not be to go rat them out. (I haven't had that conversation about gender transition, but I have occasionally kept confidences about drugs or sex.) That practice comes from my sincerely held moral beliefs, which I fear the current Court would not recognize.

I also wonder when a student's behavior might trip such a requirement. If Samantha tells her teachers she wants to be called Sam, and starts wearing gender-nonspecific jeans and t-shirts, are they supposed to call the parents?


It's a telling point that the version of the SAVE Act (another law that solves no problems) that Trump is throwing his hissy fit about isn't just about making it harder to vote, it's also about attacking trans people. The version of SAVE passed by the House and held up in the Senate just focused on disenfranchising people who don't have passports or easy access to their birth certificates or marriage licenses. But Trump wants to add:

NO MEN IN WOMEN’S SPORTS: NO TRANSGENDER MUTILIZATION FOR CHILDREN!

Translation: Ban transwomen from women's sports and make gender-affirming care illegal for minors. Those provisions deserve their own argument, which maybe I'll get to later. But the simpler question is: Why should they be part of a voter-suppression law?

The answer is simple: Transfolk are to Trump what Jews were to Hitler or Blacks have been to the KKK. His base has been trained to hate them, and he can sometimes transfer the energy of that hatred to some other issue, even a completely unrelated issue like voting.


Morgana Ignis:

Trump just declared that he’d ban trans women from the Olympics. Only one openly transgender woman has ever competed in the Olympic Games in its history. In 2020. She did not win a medal. This is fabricated controversy to fuel bigotry. Like banning trans women from owning nuclear weapons.

and you also might be interested in ...

Courts near the border are clogged with misdemeanor trespass cases that serve little purpose and are usually thrown out by judges. By declaring the border area a military zone, the administration created a new crime that most people who commit it have never heard of.


More and more, the Bezos-owned Washington Post is becoming a mouthpiece for a billionaire agenda. Here's what I saw in their opinion section on just one day (yesterday). This piece on Pittsburgh sets up a false dichotomy between city services and progressive politics, essentially blaming progressive Democrats for the state of the city, which is painted in the same gloomy colors MAGA uses to describe all Democrat-run big cities. Pittsburgh's new centrist Democrat mayor is a "lesson" for the national party to shift away from its progressive wing.

Zohran Mamdani wants to tax New Yorkers "to death", but

Of course, New York doesn’t need more revenue — the city could simply cut expenditures, starting with Mamdani’s $127 billion spending plan for fiscal year 2027.

which is described in the next paragraph as "a socialist laundry list".

Chicago also is portrayed as on the brink of insolvency. And San Francisco's BART is "headed for a financial death spiral". What looks on the surface like a fluffy denunciation of fancy coffee drinks is some guy from the Hoover Institute quoting Edmund Burke about how our failure to control our appetites is ruining society. A fair point, maybe, but why is the example a type of excess associated with upscale liberals, rather than say Bezos' half-billion-dollar yacht?

And James Talerico's candidacy isn't inviting Christians to return to the teachings of Jesus, it's a return to the failed views of liberal Christians in general, which the religion market rejected in the 20th century in favor of right-wing Christianity.

None of these pieces is outright pro-fascist, and any one of them might have a place on the editorial page of a newspaper trying to present a balance of views. But the WaPo bombards readers with all of them on the same day, with no voices at all from left of center.


Today, the WaPo warns DC not to raise its minimum wage and that congestion pricing would cripple downtown DC. It also breaks with its usual opposition to taxes so that it can denounce Katie Porter's plan to eliminate the California state income tax for families making less than $100K.


NPR has an article about Spartanburg County, South Carolina, which is experiencing "the biggest measles outbreak in the U.S. in more than three decades, with nearly 1,000 confirmed cases". The reason? The vaccination rate has fallen to 89%, well below the 95% necessary to achieve herd immunity.

And why are parents so reluctant to vaccinate their kids? One of the reasons is "lingering resentment over COVID mandates".

"I think it should have been a choice. It shouldn't have been shoved down your throat like you have to do it."

It's amazing to me how quickly the popular culture has minimized the COVID pandemic. (Starting with Trump, who minimized it while it was happening.) 1.2 million Americans died of COVID. When the country has to deal with a disaster that big, you're not going to keep all your freedom. I mean, think about 9-11, and how much disruption of daily life followed from that. But in terms of deaths, COVID was hundreds of times larger than 9-11. At the pandemic's peak, it was like a 9-11 was happening every day or two.

So yes, once a vaccine existed, the government absolutely should have "shoved it down your throat". And they should shove a lot of other vaccines down your throat too, so that the general population doesn't have to worry about polio or smallpox.


A deposition under oath made it clear that a DOGE staffer tasked with flagging National Endowment for the Humanities grants to cancel due to DEI actually had no idea what DEI was and no education in the humanities. Having no knowledge himself, he used ChatGPT to

search programs and grants to cut using terms such as “Black," "gender," “LGBTQ+," and "equality." However, DOGE would not search for cuts from anything involving terms like "caucasian” and “heterosexual.”

That and similar clips went viral, but I can't link to them because a judge has ordered them removed. Apparently, they exposed the DOGE tech bros to "widespread ridicule".

Imagine that: Young idiots served as judge and jury over NEH grants they did not understand. And now they're being ridiculed. How unfair!


I am enjoying "The Ballad of Stephen Miller" from the album "MAGA Country".

and let's close with a political judo move

I've been a fan of Kat Abughazaleh since days when she used to do quick summaries each week of what Fox News was covering. Now she's running for Congress in Illinois' 9th district. The Democratic primary is hotly contested, and Kat (a Palestinian-American who has been outspoken about the Gaza genocide) has been targeted by AIPAC.

In her usual style, Kat offers her opponents an attack ad to use against her.