If we show weakness today in front of Russia, we are laying the ground for future conflict.
- President Emmanuel Macron of France
This week's featured post is "The Timescale of News, or why the Sift's weekly summary has a new format".
Significant ongoing stories
As I explain in this week's featured post, our news media only sees motion. So events that move slowly tend not to get covered. That doesn't mean they aren't important, just that they don't fit into a breaking-news model. If they get covered at all, it's usually as "context" for some faster-moving story. (Some of those faster-moving stories will get covered in the next section.) But whether you hear anything "new" about them or not during a particular news cycle, you shouldn't lose sight of them.
Here's a list of the ongoing stories that I'm paying attention to, and a few ways they manifested in this week's news.
- Climate change. This week the faster-moving story was Hurricane Erin, which briefly hit category 5 on Saturday.
- The genocide in Gaza. This tends to get coverage whenever the Israeli government announces something new. (This week Israel announced plans for a new offensive that would displace over a million Palestinians, most of whom have already been displaced multiple times.) But whether there are new announcements or not, the beat goes on: There isn't enough food; more people starve; more buildings are turned to rubble and life gets more precarious for Gaza's 2 million residents.
- Trump's assault on American democracy. This theme ties together a bunch of related stories that have played out over the last seven months. Recently, the faster-moving stories that have gotten attention are Trump's takeover of the DC police, and Texas' attempt to give Republicans five more House seats via a mid-decade gerrymander. Also, I've linked below to an account of how shows trials against people like John Brennan might go.
- The war in Ukraine. Friday's Trump-Putin summit got all the attention, but meanwhile the war continued. Russian forces continue to inch forward at a terrible cost, while Ukraine puts up a fierce resistance, also at a terrible cost. Trump is right to want to "stop the killing", as he so often says. But fundamentally this is a war of conquest, so it will continue until the aggressor -- Putin's Russia -- either achieves its goals on the battlefield or is convinced that it can't achieve them.
- Trump's tariffs are tanking the economy. I explained the larger pattern last week in "An Authoritarian Economy is a Bad Economy". This week's news-visible piece was a report from the Labor Department on the producer price index (PPI), which rose 0.9% in July. That's the largest monthly jump in three years.
The Epstein-files story is not gone yet, though I continue to wonder how significant it is. It didn't make many headlines this week, largely because Congress is in recess. The basic situation is that Trump's Justice Department has a lot of information on Epstein which it refuses to release, despite the fact that Trump campaigned on releasing it, and the Justice Department is run by people who used to insist on releasing it. Administration officials constantly say that they want full transparency. But they clearly don't, and (while it's easy to imagine that the reason somehow concerns Trump's friendship with Epstein) no one knows exactly why.
The Justice Department tried to pass the buck by asking a court to release the grand jury files on Epstein-related cases. But a judge turned that request down, and anyway, those files probably don't contain much relevant evidence that isn't already public. Congress went into recess early so that Republicans could avoid voting on a resolution calling for release of the Justice Department's Epstein files. But the story hasn't died, and they'll have to come back into session eventually.
The one clear significance the Epstein files story has is political: It's the first broken Trump promise that his base is taking seriously.
This week's developments
The Trump-Putin summit
All week the news networks were full of speculation about what would happen when Trump and Putin met Friday. I found this tedious, because it was totally obvious what would happen: the same thing that always happens. As I observed last week: "Whenever Trump meets with Putin, he comes out repeating Putin’s talking points."
Going in, Trump was demanding an immediate ceasefire and threatening "severe consequences" if he didn't get one. But Putin didn't agree to the ceasefire, and there are no consequences.
Putin went in saying that a ceasefire could only come about as part of a comprehensive settlement that involved Ukraine yielding significant amounts of territory to Russia. He clearly thinks he is winning on the battlefield -- albeit slowly -- and will continue to win as long as the West fails to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to turn the tide. So he believes that time is on his side. He'll only stop the fighting if he is given what he wants.
Trump came out of the summit saying that he would push for a comprehensive settlement rather than an immediate ceasefire. And that Ukraine would have to yield significant amounts of territory to Russia.

Fox News reported:
After meeting with Putin, Trump said the Russian leader was willing to end the war in exchange for key Ukrainian territorial concessions. He added that Kyiv should take the deal because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not."
On Truth Social, Trump painted Zelenskyy as the obstacle to peace.
President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight. Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE.
This is exactly Putin's position: The fighting will stop when Ukraine gives up the territory Russia wants. In exchange they'll get his pinkie-swear that he won't invade the rest of the country after he's had time to replenish his losses. And any enforceable guarantees to the rest of Ukraine, like membership in NATO, is off the table.
Trump also may pinkie-swear that Putin will face severe consequences if he starts the war up again at a more convenient time. (News stories refer to this as "security guarantees".) But we've seen what Trump's "consequences" amount to when he's dealing with Putin.
Fundamentally, this is the same deal that Neville Chamberlain made with Hitler at Munich: Give up territory, get meaningless promises.
Zelenskyy is scheduled to visit the White House today, flanked by some supportive European leaders. Presumably the Europeans want to avoid the ganging-up-on-Zelenskyy that happened the last time he went to the White House.
James Fallows describes just how weird the vibe was at the Trump-Putin post-summit press conference. Trump was both the host and the leader of the more powerful country. He should have indisputably been in charge. But he wasn't.
In every previous such event I have seen, the American president has always taken control. The president steps first to the microphone and begins the proceedings. He welcomes guests and foreign counterparts. He frames the issues. He expresses American ambitions, values, and interests.
He acts, in effect, not just as host but also as the boss. No one doubts who is running things.
And he does this all in English. Even if he could speak other languages. (Several presidents have been functional in a variety of languages, including Herbert Hoover in Chinese.) He does this because he is in the United States. We are playing by his home country’s rules.
But yesterday, in every conceivable way, Vladimir Putin was in command.
Putin spoke first, spoke at greater length than Trump, and framed all the issues Russia's way. There's an alpha in the Putin/Trump relationship, and it isn't Trump.
Trump sending the National Guard to D.C.

Last Monday, Trump declared a "crime emergency" in the District of Columbia, proclaiming that "crime is out of control" in DC.
But just last January, DoJ reported that violent crime in DC was at a 30-year low. US News maintains a list of the 25 most dangerous cities in the US, and DC is not on it. (#1 is Memphis. Maybe Trump should take that up with Tennessee's Republican governor. Red states Missouri and Ohio each have three cities on the list.)

That's not to deny that there is crime in DC and crime is bad wherever it is. But the point here isn't to fight crime, it's to
- burnish Trump's image as a tough guy who makes forceful decisions and isn't afraid to unleash the military on American citizens
- reinforce the false impression that cities governed by Democrats are dangerous
- hopefully produce video of National Guardsmen beating up some black or brown people. (Trump's base eats that stuff up.)
What the invasion of DC has produced is overreach that has gotten ridiculed. Sean Charles Dunn, a veteran and former DoJ lawyer, got into a confrontation with a border patrol agent. He yelled obscenities at the agent, and then threw a "sub-style sandwich" at him. He was charged with assaulting a federal officer, a felony.
Referring to Dunn's offense, AG Pam Bondi tweeted:
If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you.
That's really, really hilarious, given Trump's pardon of the people who assaulted police officers with flagpoles and bear spray on January 6. Some of them now work for the Trump administration.
Social media couldn't stop laughing, producing memes like the one above.
The redistricting wars
The Texas Democrats who left the state to deny Republicans a quorum in the legislature are returning today. Presumably the vote on Trump's plans to gain five more House seats via gerrymandering will move forward.
It was never reasonable to expect the Democratic legislators to stay away forever. The Texas legislature is not a full-time job, and these people have lives they need to get back to. Kids are starting school, their other jobs won't stay open forever, they need paychecks, and so on.
What they accomplished with their 15-day walkout was to give Democrats a chance to publicize this attempt to cheat in the 2026 midterms, and make it possible for Gavin Newsom to come up with a counter-plan to redistrict California. The plan depends on a voter referendum to be voted on in November. We'll see if the current state of Democratic anger and commitment can maintain itself until then.
Meanwhile, Governor Newsom has been doing some epic trolling of Trump, issuing threats to redistrict California in Trump's social media style:
DONALD “TACO” TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, “MISSED” THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE “BEAUTIFUL MAPS,” THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!). BIG PRESS CONFERENCE THIS WEEK WITH POWERFUL DEMS AND GAVIN NEWSOM — YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR — THAT WILL BE DEVASTATING FOR “MAGA.” THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! — GN
Stories that should have gotten coverage but didn't

But it's important not to identify all Israelis or all Jews with the Netanyahu government. Something like 400K Israelis protested yesterday, demanding an end to the war.
Pretty much every week, climate change could be in the news much more than it is.

Other things you might find interesting

An appeals court lifted a lower court's order for the Trump administration to restore funding to USAID. It was a 2-1 ruling. The court didn't deal with the underlying question of whether Trump can impound funds appropriated by Congress. It just found that the wrong people sued. An anti-impoundment lawsuit, apparently, needs to come from the Government Accountability Office.
It's easy to brush off Trump's threats to unleash the Justice Department on people like Senator Adam Schiff or former CIA Director John Brennon. He can order investigations, but there's nothing to find and there's still a justice system. So the threat of prison is not serious.
Marcy Wheeler, though, unpacks what a show trial might look like, using the example of John Durham's investigation from Trump's first term. He had nothing and must have known he had nothing, but he garnered a lot of Fox News headlines on his way to losing in court.
and I'll get back to closing segments
I really will. I just ran out of time this week.