Monday, January 31, 2022

Such Stories

It would take many books, my life. And no one wants anyway to hear such stories.

- Holocaust survivor Vladek Spiegelman,
quoted by his son Art in Maus

This week's featured post is "McMinn County's Maus Problem".

This week everybody was talking about Ukraine

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/01/25/revisionist-history/

Often in this blog, I encourage people to trust the experts. Unless you have some really solid reason not to, listen to the CDC about Covid, and to the climate scientists about global warming. If a bipartisan election commission certifies your state's results, believe them. And so on.

Defense and foreign policy, though, is one place where I get skeptical. I don't usually characterize national-security-state insiders as villains, but I also don't always believe what they say. I remember how they misled us into the Iraq invasion, and how victory in our 20-year Afghan War was always just a few months away. I also remember how easily respected news platforms like The New York Times and The Washington Post let themselves be used to spread Iraq-invasion propaganda.

So now the experts are warning us that Russia might invade Ukraine at any moment, and they could be right. I certainly have no reason to think Putin is on the side of the angels, or that he was satisfied by the chunks of Ukraine he stole away in 2014.

But still. This is one of the hidden costs of the Iraq deception: The Pentagon and the State Department have lost a lot of credibility with Americans like me. It's going to take a long time to win it back, if in fact they deserve to win it back -- which they might not.

So who do we believe in all this?

The most convincing thing I read this week was written by Ukrainians. The gist is that Putin does threaten Ukraine, but not as immediately as Western sources make it sound.

According to our estimates, supported by many of the indicators below, a large-scale general military operation can’t take place for at least the next two or three weeks. As of Jan. 23, we do not observe the required formation of several hundred thousand troops, not only on the border with Ukraine, but also on Russian territory behind the front line.

They're not seeing behind-the-lines mobilizations necessary for a major invasion, like medical infrastructure for handling mass casualties. Overall troop deployments, they say, haven't changed since April.

Russia could mobilize for an invasion -- that's where the "two or three weeks" comes from -- but the Ukrainian writers don't think it's likely.

Overall, a large-scale offensive operation with an attempt to hold large occupied territories is a gamble that has no chance of a positive outcome for Russia. It is impossible to calculate the course of such an operation, and when implemented, it will quickly move to an uncontrollable point. 

When we add non-military components to this formula, such as international isolation and sanctions, then the result of an invasion will be politically suicidal for the Kremlin. We believe that, if Putin and his team have not lost their ability to think rationally, they will not go for such a scenario. 

More likely, they say, is a multi-faceted pressure campaign aimed at "destabilization and demoralization of the population". The troops on the border are part of that, but so are

cyberattacks, which are already taking place, ... psychological operations, such as active disinformation, mass bomb threats at schools, subway systems, administrative offices, and other facilities, along with the spread of disinformation and other methods.


A Putin talking point that I've seen repeated on both the Left and the Right is that NATO promised Russia in 1991 that it would stop expanding. This seems not to be true.


One striking thing about the media debate in America is how quickly the MAGA-right repeats Putin's propaganda. Peter Navarro parrots Putin's line that "Ukraine is not really a country." Tucker Carlson on multiple occasions has wondered why the US would side with Ukraine rather than Russia. The distinctions between aggressor and target, or between democracy and authoritarianism, seem to elude him.

Meanwhile, Tucker's identification with the authoritarian nationalist government of Hungary gets ever more explicit. The new "documentary" Hungary vs. Soros: The Fight for Civilization that Carlson has made for the subscriber channel Fox Nation supports Hungarian strongman Viktor Orban's Nazi-themed tropes: Jewish money is behind Hungary's troubles.

https://ragingpencils.com/2022/1-28-22-death-to-democracy.html

and the Supreme Court

https://www.reformaustin.org/political-cartoons/supremely-partisan/

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, one of the three liberals remaining, announced his retirement Thursday, kicking off what is sure to be an epic battle over his replacement.

President Biden had promised during the campaign that he would nominate the first Black woman to the Court, and he appears ready to make good on that promise. There are many worthy candidates, as you would suspect from the fact that previous presidents haven't used up any of the good choices.

Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi characterized Biden's unnamed nominee as "a beneficiary of affirmative action", and without knowing any more about her than her race and gender, predicted that "this new justice will probably not get a single Republican vote".

I will point out that Jackie Robinson was an "affirmative action" pick in exactly the same sense: Branch Rickey went looking for a Black player to sign, because he saw the Negro Leagues as an untapped source of talent for the Dodgers.

and the pandemic

The Omicron wave is now clearly receding in most the country, particularly in the Northeast. But case-numbers are still high: 519K new cases per day in the US, down 35% in two weeks. Hospitalizations seem to have peaked also -- 144K, down 8% in two weeks -- but have not yet begun to fall sharply. Deaths still haven't peaked: 2524 per day, up 28%.

Weirdly, at this moment when deaths are higher than they've been in about a year, we're seeing a lot of calls to end special Covid precautions entirely and go "back to normal". You know how when you get an infection, the doctor tells you to finish the antibiotic prescription even if you start feeling better? It's like that. Historian John Barry, author of The Great Influenza, explains what we can learn from that pandemic.

Nearly all cities in the United States imposed restrictions during the pandemic’s virulent second wave, which peaked in the fall of 1918. That winter, some cities reimposed controls when a third, though less deadly wave struck. But virtually no city responded in 1920. People were weary of influenza, and so were public officials. Newspapers were filled with frightening news about the virus, but no one cared. People at the time ignored this fourth wave; so did historians. The virus mutated into ordinary seasonal influenza in 1921, but the world had moved on well before.

We should not repeat that mistake. ...

As in 1920, people are tired of taking precautions.

This is ceding control to the virus. The result has been that even though Omicron appears to be less virulent, the seven-day average for daily Covid-19 deaths in the United States has now surpassed the Delta peak in late September.

Worse, the virus may not be finished with us.

https://theweek.com/political-satire/1009480/covid-is-over

The FDA is withdrawing monoclonal antibody treatments that were based on antibodies to previous versions of the virus and that provably don't work on Omicron. But Ron DeSantis and other anti-public-health conservatives have embraced monoclonal antibodies as the one Covid-fighting method they can support, and they're having trouble backing away from it.

Rand Paul has gone so far as to put forward a conspiracy theory: The FDA is taking away an effective treatment in order to "punish" conservative states like Florida.


A new low in Fox News' deadly Covid-disinformation project: Tucker Carlson listens attentively while his invited guest Alex Berenson says:

The mRNA COVID vaccines need to be withdrawn from the market. No one should get them. No one should get boosted. No one should get double boosted. They are a dangerous and ineffective product at this point.


I don't usually link to those gloating look-who-died-of-Covid stories, but I'm going to make an exception for Robert LaMay, a former Washington state trooper who in October made a viral video out of his decision to lose his job rather than comply with Governor Inslee's vaccine mandate for state employees. "Jay Inslee can kiss my ass," he broadcast from his patrol car. The video was clearly a planned stunt, because the dispatcher was prepared to respond with a list of LaMay's accomplishments.

LaMay went on talk shows "non-stop" for a day or two afterward, including Laura Ingraham's show on Fox News. "What's next for you?" Ingraham asked. "Other than being a celebrity."

I'll bet that Ingraham won't do a follow-up, now that her question has an answer: LaMay died of Covid on Friday, about three months after he made his video and appeared on her show. At least he wasn't able to use his status as a state patrolman to infect members of the general public, who aren't allowed to socially distance themselves from the police. Thank you, Jay Inslee.

BTW: Fox News itself has a vaccine mandate, which it doesn't like to talk about. Tucker Carlson, in spite of spreading misinformation about vaccines night after night, always refuses to say whether he has been vaccinated. If he himself were the kind of anti-vax hero he frequently praises, don't you think he'd say so?

and censorship

The featured post delves into a Tennessee school board's decision to cancel an 8th-grade reading module based on the Holocaust-survivor graphic novel Maus.


Newly inaugurated Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin has set up an email address for concerned parents to report teachers who engage in "divisive practices" like teaching critical race theory. Because that's what freedom-loving people do: They snitch on each other to the government.

He appears not to have thought this out very well, though, because a very predictable thing happened: The account has been deluged with prank reports like “Albus Dumbeldore was teaching that full blooded wizards discriminated against mudbloods!”

For shame, people! You should definitely NOT send prank emails to

helpeducation@governor.virginia.gov

https://thenib.com/sensitive-snowflakes/

and you also might be interested in ...

The most nerve-wracking part of the James Webb telescope mission has passed. The million-and-one things that had to go right for the Webb telescope to wind up fully unfolded and positioned at L2 have gone right. Now comes a few months of aligning and calibrating.


Meanwhile, Fox News has uncovered a major new Biden administration scandal: ice cream. It's even worse than Obama's tan suit. Criticizing Biden for doing something frivolous lines up with the effort to gaslight us about how hard Trump worked. "My father sat there 24 hours a day," Eric lied.


I don't pretend to know whether Bitcoin and its relatives will rebound from the latest slump. But the recent 50% drop reinforces the reasons I've stayed away from it. First, when the market started worrying about inflation, crypto-currencies behaved like speculative investments, not like the inflation hedges they're supposed to be. And second, because I don't see what you tell yourself to avoid panicking when it starts to crash. Any investment can fall, but when the value of your house crashes, you can just keep living in it. If the dollar falls, the US government will still let you pay your taxes with dollars. When a blue-chip stock slumps, you keep collecting the dividend. When the market turns against your stock in some speculative company, you can reassure yourself that the long-term trends are in place. (Businesses are still buying robots and moving their IT to the cloud.) But cryptocurrencies have no underlying fundamentals. When they fall, they just fall.


Despite devoting an indefensible amount of my time to watching sports, I usually don't discuss sports on this blog. I'll make an exception for this week's vote on the Baseball Hall of Fame, in which Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens failed to get in on their final year of eligibility.

Fans have strong opinions both ways about this, and here's mine: It's not a Hall of Virtue, it's a Hall of Fame. The point of going to Cooperstown isn't to worship role models, but to revisit your memories of being a fan, and to imagine what it was like to be a fan in the distant past.

If you were a baseball fan in the 1990s and early 2000s, most of your memories are of Bonds, Clemens, Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire, and a bunch of other guys who are not in Cooperstown because of suspicion of steroid use. Maybe you loved those players and maybe you hated them, but you can't remember the era without them. The story of baseball in those years was their story, but the Hall has decided to pretend none of that happened.

I'd extend amnesty to to other eras as well. Joe Jackson should be in the Hall, and Pete Rose. Gaylord Perry threw an illegal spitball most of his career, but he got in, and I'm fine with that. These guys aren't supposed to be heroes, just baseball players.


Apropos of nothing in particular:

https://jensorensen.com/2022/01/26/acceleration-change-disruption-cartoon/

and let's close with some white-on-white crime

In a move that looks oddly romantic, a white rabbit nibbles a snowman's carrot nose.

Monday, January 17, 2022

Capricious Processes

No Sift next week. New articles will appear on January 31.

As these decisions show, the Court’s future hinges less on the text of federal law and the Constitution than on the capricious process by which conservatives define what it means to be one of them.

- Adam Serwer
"The Culture War Has Warped the Supreme Court's Judgment"

This week's featured posts are "Merrick Garland Starts Getting Serious" and "The Court and the Vaccine Mandates".

This week everybody was talking about voting rights

https://theweek.com/political-satire/1009018/the-fireman

Ever since Georgia passed its new voter-suppression law last March, Democrats at the federal level have been talking about protecting voting rights. But with a zero-vote margin in the Senate, and voting rights not fitting into any of the existing holes in the filibuster, talking is about all they've managed to do.

The conversation started with the For the People Act, which Senator Manchin said he couldn't support. But then he seemed to do the responsible thing: He spelled out what he could support, and what he claimed enough Republicans would support to overcome a filibuster. A compromise Freedom to Vote Act was worked out, which Stacey Abrams -- the avatar of voting rights -- endorsed.

Unfortunately, Manchin was wrong; Republicans unanimously reject his bill too, and none of them came forward with a plausible counterproposal. They also successfully filibustered the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, with Lisa Murkowski the only Republican voting yes. So the question boiled down to the filibuster: If the filibuster lives, federal protection of voting rights dies.

Manchin and fellow right-leaning Democrat (I'm refusing to use the much-abused media label "moderate") Kyrsten Sinema have been saying all year that they didn't want to change the filibuster. But as with Biden's Build Back Better bill, many Democrats continued to insist their minds could be changed.

They couldn't. Sinema in particular has laid out her thinking on the topic, in an argument that doesn't make a whole lot of sense: Democrats will need the filibuster when Republicans get back into power. Jonathan Chait responds:

But how many times did the filibuster stop [Trump] from carrying out an abuse of power? Not one. You can go through a long list of Trump’s norm-shattering behavior without finding a successful filibuster. Sometimes he appointed unqualified or pliant cronies to executive-branch positions, but those votes already have a 50-vote threshold. Other times, he ignored norms or laws, but he didn’t need Senate approval to do that. In theory, Trump needed Senate approval to build a border wall in the South, but in practice, he just did it anyway through executive action.

The Senate plans to debate both the Freedom to Vote and the John Lewis bills tomorrow, but both seem doomed.

https://www.reformaustin.org/political-cartoons/save-the-filibuster/

and the Capitol Insurrection

New developments in the case this week are discussed in one of the featured posts: 11 OathKeepers were indicted for seditious conspiracy, and the multi-state plot to produce fraudulent Electoral College votes started coming to light.

Asha Rangappa explains the current vision of how Trump's coup was supposed to work.

Just so we don't lose our sense of humor completely, Randy Rainbow already had a song ready a year ago.

and the Supreme Court

The other featured post covers the Court's contradictory opinions on vaccine mandates. It's hard to find any coherent legal reasoning here, but John Roberts' political patterns explain everything.

In other legal news: The Ohio Supreme Court struck down a pro-GOP redistricting map. The Court believes Ohio voters actually meant what they said when they passed an anti-gerrymandering ballot proposition in 2018.

We reject the notion that Ohio voters rallied so strongly behind an anti-gerrymandering amendment to the Ohio Constitution yet believed at the time that the amendment was toothless

And Ted Cruz' effort to take down an anti-corruption law is going to the Supreme Court.

and the pandemic

The Omicron wave seems to be peaking. Or rather, the peak has passed in the Northeast, while the rest of the country is still on the up-slope. Currently, the US is averaging 802K new cases per day, up 98% in two weeks, but down fractionally from 807K on Friday. Hospitalizations are at 156K, up 61%, and deaths are at 1964, up 57%. The West has now passed the Northeast as the region with the most per capita new cases.

Bob Wachter provides a useful tweetstorm explaining what will and won't change over the next month, and why he believes we'll face less Covid risk then.

and you also might be interested in ...

MLK Day should be our annual reminder not to turn Martin Luther King into a moderate. Conservatives would reduce him to that one "content of their character" quote and claim he supported the superficial kind of color-blindness where people pretend not to notice what race anybody is. There was much more to King than that, and most of it was pretty radical in its day. A lot of it still is.


I haven't said much about the Russia/NATO/Ukraine thing because I don't understand it. It's hard for me to tell what is a bluff, what is overreaction, and what is real.


A Brooklyn junior is one of the few American high school students who has taken an actual class in Critical Race Theory.

When we discussed CRT in our short workshop, we were taught the basic premise of critical race theory — that the underlying cause of racism within our country is institutional oppression built into American government and law. This structural racism shows up in systems such as the electoral college, which allowed slaveholding states disproportionate representation, and the prison-industrial complex, which upholds forced labor to this day.

But he wasn't taught to hate White people, to hate the United States, or any of the other things CRT opponents denounce.


Talking Points Memo reader JS is a lawyer-turned-teacher who explains why the pandemic experience is going to hurt teacher morale and retention for years to come.

Maybe we should just say, well, if waitstaff at restaurants and everyone else can be forced to show up, then so can we, and I think there’s something to that. But if you want to destroy the morale of an entire class of people, point out that [their] biggest anxiety is well founded: in other words, you are basically like a fast food employee despite what we say about your education and training and your job requirements. 

A lot of the trends in education of late are to deprofessionalize the job and make teaching into commodity work. The low pay tickles that anxiety. We have as many units as an MBA or an MFT just to get credentialed. We have the student loan debt to match, but it can seem like it’s all a lie. We’re really just babysitters.


Novak Djokovic left Australia Sunday, concluding the long back-and-forth about whether the unvaccinated tennis star could play in the Australian Open, which starts today.


I've never cared about the British royal family, to the extent that I had to look up which prince Andrew is. (He's the Queen's second son.) But the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is taking him down too. He hasn't been convicted of anything, but he has lost his royal titles and faces a lawsuit from a woman who claims Epstein forced her to have sex with Andrew when she was 17.

and let's close with something musical

Have you ever listened to a new popular song and felt like you'd heard it before? Sir Mashalot went further than that: He proved it by remixing six popular country songs into one seamless whole.

Monday, January 10, 2022

Lies and Violence

Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence.

- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

This week's featured post is my review of what we now know about January 6, "One Year Later".

This week everybody was talking about the January 6 insurrection

The featured post is my look back at January 6, but everyone else was doing it too. Here's the Late Show's musical tribute.

President Biden also spoke out more forcefully than usual.

For the first time in our history, a president had not just lost an election, he tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob breached the Capitol. But they failed. They failed. And on this day of remembrance, we must make sure that such attack never, never happens again.

... We must be absolutely clear about what is true and what is a lie. And here's the truth: the former president of the United States of America has created and spread a web of lies about the 2020 election. He's done so because he values power over principle. Because he sees his own interest as more important than his country's interest and America's interest. And because his bruised ego matters more to him than our democracy or our constitution.

But my favorite line was "You can't love your country only when you win."

https://www.startribune.com/sack-cartoon-a-guide-to-the-jan-6-insurrection/600132658/

Meanwhile, the Maricopa County Elections Department put out a report that systematically went through all the conspiracy theories about the 2020 election in Arizona's largest county, concluding

The November 2020 general election was administered with with integrity and the results were accurate and reliable. ... The Elections Department followed all state and federal laws.

The report responds to the questions raised by the pro-Trump-biased Cyber Ninja election audit, typically concluding that the Ninjas were confused by their own ignorance of election law and the county's voting systems, and that they then interpreted their confusion as evidence of nefarious activity.

We determined that nearly every finding included faulty analysis, inaccurate claims, misleading conclusions and a lack of understanding of federal and state election laws.

The Elections Department operates under the supervision of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, which has a Republican majority.

In other Arizona election news, the Cyber Ninjas are insolvent and are shutting down. I've gotta wonder what happened to the millions of dollars MAGA fans contributed to them.

and the pandemic

The vertical ascent in the new-cases graph continued this week. New cases are averaging 678K per day, more than tripling in the last two weeks. Hospitalizations have also turned upwards, but not as steeply: up 82% in two weeks, to roughly the same level as last January's peak. Deaths have turned upward as well, but are nowhere near previous peaks: The seven-day average is 1674 now, compared to 1160 two weeks ago, but 2555 on September 22 and 3344 last January 16.

Those numbers remain hard to interpret: Many of the new cases will undoubtedly progress to hospitalizations or deaths in the coming weeks. But it also increasingly looks like the Omicron variant is somewhat milder than Delta. (Though possibly worse here than in Europe.) Unfortunately, the case-numbers are so huge that even smaller percentages turning serious will still produce a lot of serious cases. And 1674 deaths each day from a single disease is a toll that would have shocked us two years ago.

So it's hard to answer the questions we all really want to ask: How risky is it to go to the grocery or eat in a restaurant or have people over for dinner? You're more likely than ever to catch Covid, but maybe you'll throw it off, especially if you've had three shots. Personally, I'm erring on the side of caution.


The really difficult question right now is when/whether to open the schools. I think there's a broad consensus that distance learning didn't work very well for a lot of kids, and that we should have had more in-person school last year. But now? With 600K+ new cases per day?

I can hear the debate inside my own head: "Wouldn't it make sense to stay closed for a week or two until the surge passes?" "But everybody was saying 'two weeks' when we first closed the schools in March, 2020. How do we know that two weeks won't turn into six months?"


NPR provides guidance on when and how to test.


On January 1, at least 800K unused Covid tests expired in a Florida warehouse. A state official explained: "We tried to give them out prior to that, but there wasn't a demand for it."

and the Supreme Court

which heard arguments about President Biden's vaccine mandates, one applying to health care workers (including those at nursing homes), and the other to businesses with more than 100 employees.

You might think this should be just another note under the pandemic headline, but that's not really what this case is about. The Court's conservative justices have been looking for a chance to make a sweeping "nondelegation" ruling that cripples federal regulating agencies in general. Vaccine mandates are just an opportunity for six unelected judges -- half appointed by a president who lost the popular vote -- to remake American government.

In other words, the vaccine cases reach a Supreme Court that appears to be on the verge of reining in the ability of federal agencies to regulate any and all private conduct — a trend that has nothing at all to do with the Covid pandemic or the Biden administration’s responses to it.

In both situations, the law passed by Congress is clear:

Congress enacted the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), which gives a similarly named agency — the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) — sweeping authority to protect workers from health hazards. Among other things, Congress gave OSHA the power to issue binding rules that provide “medical criteria which will assure insofar as practicable that no employee will suffer diminished health, functional capacity, or life expectancy as a result of his work experience.”

Ordinarily, OSHA must complete a lumbering process that requires years of study and consulting with employers before it can hand down a new rule, but a provision of the OSH Act permits OSHA to issue an “emergency temporary standard” if the agency determines that “employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful,” and that such a standard is “necessary to protect employees from such danger.”

If anything qualifies as an emergency, you would think that a plague killing over a thousand people a day would, especially given that several of the early outbreaks were in workplaces. So this is exactly the kind of situation Congress had in mind when it passed OSH in 1970 (and sent it to be signed by that flaming socialist Richard Nixon).

But not so fast. The OSH Act, like the founding legislation of most of the federal regulatory agencies, violates a principle that conservative jurists invented precisely for the purpose of wrecking federal regulatory agencies: nondelegation. According to the nondelegation doctrine, Congress violates the Constitution if it delegates too much of its power to agencies of the executive branch. So it doesn't matter what OSH says, because it's unconstitutional. Congress should have to pass a new law every time the country needs a new regulation -- or at least a regulation that the Court's conservative majority doesn't like.

Have you seen what we have to go through to pass a law these days? Imagine needing to overcome a filibuster every time there's a new carcinogenic food additive.

Ominously, Chief Justice Roberts drew attention to OSH being more than 50 years old. Recall that his main rationale for gutting the Voting Rights Act in 2013 was that "things have changed", a legal principle I am unable to find in the Constitution. No wonder Vox's Ian Millhiser believes

NFIB is likely to be a turning point in the right-wing Roberts Court’s relationship with the elected branches — and it could permanently disable the federal government’s ability to address crises like the Covid-19 pandemic in the future.

and electric vehiclees

The day-long traffic jam on I-95 in Virginia drew my attention because I had driven that very stretch of road just a week before. But I was still surprised by where WaPo columnist Charles Lane took the story: into scare-mongering about electric vehicles.

If everyone had been driving electric vehicles, this mess could well have been worse. ... It is a scientific fact that batteries of all kinds lose capacity more rapidly in cold weather, and that includes the sophisticated lithium-ion ones used by Teslas and other EVs. ... Absent some breakthrough in mobile charging technology, out-of-juice EVs in out-of-the-way places will need a tow. If Monday’s nightmare had been an all-electric affair, they might have littered the highway for miles.

A few quick observations:

  • Dissing EVs is a hobby horse for Lane. He's also done it here and here, where he described EV-skepticism as his 10-year "fixation".
  • An electric-vehicle driver running the heater and wondering when his battery will die is in basically the same situation as a gas-powered-vehicle driver watching his fuel gauge go down.
  • Mobile charging doesn't require a "breakthrough". Systems "designed to be carried by a standard roadside-service truck" already exist, it's just a matter of deploying them -- which service stations should be eager to do as the number of EVs on the road increases. In the same way that a gas-powered car can be rescued with a single can of gas, and doesn't require a complete fill-up, a stranded EV would just need enough juice to get to the next charging station rather than a time-consuming full charge. So in an I-95-type situation, one truck should be able to get many EVs moving again.
  • In the meantime, you can put your Tesla in neutral and push it into the breakdown lane, right next to all the cars that have run out of gas.
  • Lane waves off the popularity of EVs in frigid Norway, but his reasons for doing so are sketchy. For example, the link supposedly supporting his claim that Norwegian EVs are almost all second cars goes to a 2014 survey. Could anything possibly have changed since then?
  • As I know from driving my hybrid Accord, cold weather does have an effect on batteries, but it's nothing to panic about. The cold also lowers the mileage of my gas-only second car.

I'm reminded of last February, when Texas Governor Greg Abbott blamed the collapse of his state's electrical grid on green energy's supposed inability to cope with cold weather, rather than his own free-market dogmatism. But somehow Wisconsin and Germany hadn't noticed the same limitations.

The lesson I draw: Change is scary, so light-on-facts horror stories about the New often sound more convincing than they should. Remember when same-sex marriage was "presaging the fall of Western Civilization itself"?


Fascinating look at how Tesla was able to double its car production in 2021, while larger automakers often had to shut down plants for lack of key components:

When Tesla couldn’t get the chips it had counted on, it took the ones that were available and rewrote the software that operated them to suit its needs. Larger auto companies couldn’t do that because they relied on outside suppliers for much of their software and computing expertise.

and you also might be interested in ...

The Webb Space Telescope has successfully deployed its mirror, which had been folded up to fit inside the launch vehicle. The unfolding in space required 178 separate release mechanisms to work, and they did.


The three men who lynched Ahmaud Arbery while he was out jogging were sentenced to life in prison. Only one of the three will be eligible for parole.


Notable deaths seem to come in clusters. This week: Sidney Poitier. There was a time in my childhood when Poitier was the only bankable Black actor. And of course, he only played characters that were specifically written as Black. The idea of a general-purpose Black movie star like Denzel Washington or Morgan Freeman, who might compete for any role not specifically written as some other race, was far in the future.

[W]ithout him, many filmgoers of previous generations might never have imagined an educated, Black authority figure.

Follow-up question: Who's the female version of Poitier, or of Washington and Freeman?


What if you didn't have to fund Fox News through your cable subscription? The goal of this campaign is to not to get cable systems to drop Fox, but to offer a Tucker-Carlson-free cable package that people can choose if they want.

Personally, I'd probably get the with-Fox package, because I think I need to keep an eye on the Right in order to do this blog properly. (Just this week, I wanted to check whether Sean Hannity was leading his show with the Sean-Hannity-tweet story that MSNBC was focusing on. He wasn't. I didn't watch the whole show, but Uproxx claims he never got around to mentioning it.) But I sympathize with the desire to know that your subscription money is not being used to promote White supremacy and knowingly spread disinformation.


Novak Djokovic appears to have won his battle with the Australian government. Today a judge ruled that he can enter the country without vaccination and play in the Australian Open.


As the son of a small farmer -- I mean, he was 6'1", but the farm was just 160 acres -- I have mixed feelings about John Deere's prototype "fully autonomous tractor". Driving a tractor up and down the rows is repetitive and boring -- exactly the kind of thing that an AI should be able to handle -- but it's also kind of peaceful and meditative. The idea that in a decade or two no one will do that job brings out the Luddite in me. Or maybe the John Henry.

Perversely, I think capitalism is about to achieve the Soviet vision of massive farms under unified management. It will happen not via worker collectives, but by eliminating the workers altogether.

and let's close with a photo finish

I couldn't pick which closing I liked better this week, so I'll give you two of them. First, it must be great to be a panda cub rolling in snow for the first time.

But I can't leave out an actual photo finish: the second annual Christmas Covid horse race.

Monday, January 3, 2022

Guarantees

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government

- US Constitution, Article IV, Section 4

This week's featured post is "Democracy Returns to Michigan".

This week everybody was talking about the Omicron surge

The vertical ascent in the case-count continued this week, reaching record levels. New cases are averaging over 400K per day, a record, more than tripling in the past two weeks. Hospitalizations are at 93K, up 35%. Deaths remain relatively flat, averaging 1254 per day, down 3%.

Bad as the case numbers are, the surge is still primarily restricted to the big cities east of the Mississippi. (Miami-Dade County in Florida is leading the pack with 525 new cases per day per 100K people. NYC isn't far behind at 442.) You know it won't stay there.


Hospitalizations and deaths always lag increases in new cases by 2-3 weeks, but the case-count started upwards around Thanksgiving, more than a month ago. So maybe Omicron is a less deadly variant. Maybe hospitalizations won't skyrocket and deaths will flatten out.

That optimistic take is still speculative, but a theory I mentioned last week got some confirmation this week from animal studies: Omicron isn't as likely as previous Covid variants to go deep into the lungs. That would explain the lower death toll. But animals aren't people, so that opinion should still be held lightly.

Putting aside the possibility of death, the other nightmare outcome is long Covid. It's way too soon to tell whether Omicron leads to more or less of that.


Friday, Dr. Adrienne Taren tweeted:

There are no ICU beds in all of Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, or Arkansas. Ask me how I know. Important clarification, no STAFFED icu beds that they will allow me to put a patient in.


Another interesting tweetstorm by a doctor: A medical team made up of "a Jewish physician, a Black nurse, and an Asian respiratory therapist" fight to save the life of a Covid patient with Nazi tattoos. The doctor realizes that this is getting harder for him as the pandemic wears him down, and thinks "Maybe I'm not OK."


Conservative WaPo columnist Michael Gerson points out that the religious exemptions from vaccine and mask mandates that Evangelicals want have no basis in actual Christianity.

Most evangelical posturing on covid mandates is really syncretism, a merging of unrelated beliefs — in this case, the substitution of libertarianism for Christian ethics. In this distorted form of faith, evangelical Christians are generally known as people who loudly defend their own rights. They show not radical generosity but discreditable selfishness. There is no version of the Golden Rule that would recommend Christian resistance to basic public health measures during a pandemic. This is heresy compounded by lunacy.


Harvard Professor of Public Health Joseph Allen gives a primer on masks and mask-wearing.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/SwissCheese_Respiratory_Virus_Interventions-ver3.0.png

and one year ago

https://www.ajc.com/opinion/mike-luckovich-blog/1230-mike-luckovich-an-important-list/4O6NFNIXOZEWZAP7LOXVCKAK7U/

Thursday is the one-year anniversary of the climactic event in Trump's attempted coup: the invasion of the US Capitol that temporarily stopped Congress from counting the certified electoral votes that made Joe Biden president. I expect to see a number of summary articles about what we know now that we didn't know then, which I'll link to next week.

The NYT's editorial board kicked that process off with a reminder that "Every Day is January 6 Now", begging the country to face the reality that Trump's (and his party's) attempt to subvert democracy continues.

Countless times over the past six years, up to and including the events of Jan. 6, Mr. Trump and his allies openly projected their intent to do something outrageous or illegal or destructive. Every time, the common response was that they weren’t serious or that they would never succeed. How many times will we have to be proved wrong before we take it seriously?


On Sunday talk shows, members of the January 6 Committee indicated that they have "first-hand testimony" of what was going on inside the White House during the invasion of the Capitol by Trumpist rioters. CNN noted the significance in the Committee penetrating "Donald Trump's wall of obstruction about what was going on inside the White House and his own family while he refused to stop the mob attack on the US Capitol".

One thing should be obvious and can't be repeated often enough: If Trump were proud of his actions, he wouldn't be trying so hard to keep the American people from finding out about them.


Strangely, there appears to be almost no documentation of the investigation Republicans in the Wisconsin legislature did of the 2020 election.


The Washington Post and University of Maryland ran a very weird poll related to January 6.

A few of the questions were interesting, like "How proud are you of the way democracy works in America?" In 1996, very/somewhat garnered 79% compared to not-too/not-at-all's 16%. Then there was a post-9/11 surge of pride that got that margin up to 96%-3%. Now it's at 54%-46%.

Another interesting question was "How much responsibility do you think Donald Trump bears for the attack on the US Capitol?" 60% said a "great deal" or "good amount", while 38% said "just some" or "none at all". Among Republicans, though, the split was 27%/72%, with 48% choosing "none at all".

But it starts getting odd when the poll asks about the Capitol invaders: Were they mostly violent or mostly peaceful? (violent 54%, peaceful 19%.)

So why exactly does that matter? What if "most" of the 1200 Capitol invaders were just opportunistic trespassers who came in nonviolently after the doors and/or windows were already broken, while only 400 or so intended to harm members of Congress and hang Mike Pence. Would that make the incident OK?

Apparently WaPo/UM asked the question that way so that they could compare it to a parallel question in a June poll about the George Floyd demonstrators -- where, bizarrely, the result was 46%-46%. (My small town had a series of BLM demonstrations that were 100% non-violent, as did towns all over the country. Some protesters in some cities got violent, and in some cases the police were the ones who initiated violence. I can't quite grasp the level of propaganda necessary to convince 46% of Americans that the demonstrators were "mostly violent".)

But postulating some kind of equivalence between the Floyd demonstrations and January 6 is a right-wing trope, so asking parallel questions about them is already biased. (The events were different in kind. Whatever violence spilled out of a few of the BLM demonstrations was no threat to the Constitution; January 6 was such a threat.)

Question 7 asks whether Joe Biden's election was "legitimate". (Yes 69%, No 29%.) That's a fine question to ask, but then the result is compared to a similar question about Trump in 2016. (Yes 57%, No 42%.) But circumstances make those two questions completely different in spite of their similar wording: In 2020, "illegitimate" meant legal illegitimacy based on imaginary election fraud. (In a separate question, 30% express a belief in "widespread voter fraud".) In 2016, it was moral illegitimacy based on the Electoral College anointing the loser of the popular vote -- which actually happened.

And most bizarre of all, the WaPo chose to headline a question about whether it is EVER justified for citizens to "take violent action against the government". (34% Yes, 62% No.) I mean, seriously, the amazing thing to me is why the Yes number is so low. So, the people who tried to assassinate Hitler were unjustified? The 1776 revolutionaries were unjustified?

and the new year

It's usually a mistake to assume that my particular acquaintances are typical of the world, but I can't help noticing an overall sense of pessimism about 2022. People who let themselves feel hopeful about 2021 don't want to get burned again.

But one lesson all the investing books teach is contrarianism: When everybody seems to be in the same mood, you can get an advantage by acting out of the opposite mood. So if you invest confidently when everyone else is panicking, or show caution when everyone else is taking chances, most of the time you'll do well.

Consider the possibility that the same thing works on a larger scale. What if the current widespread pessimism means that there are opportunities lying around waiting to be seized? You would need to choose them carefully and judge them wisely, but there's time to do that, because the optimists who would ordinarily beat you to them are temporarily sidelined.


I've got to agree with Amanda Marcotte:

Last night [i.e. New Year's Eve], the subject of what year was worse — 2020 or 2021? — came up. And the very fact that we could talk about this with friends we were welcoming the new year in with answered that question. 2021 sucked, but don’t let recency bias fool you. It wasn’t as bad.


https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10226713843502775&set=a.1493806195677

Unlike most prognosticators, Vox grades itself at the end of the year. They did pretty well in 2021.


If you're experiencing blockages in your humor supply chain, check out McSweeney's 21 most-read articles of 2021.

and you also might be interested in ...

Betty White died just weeks away from her planned 100th birthday party. People magazine celebrated prematurely.

Several news sites picked out one moment in 1954 as her finest hour: She ignored demands not to host African-American tap dancer Arthur Duncan on her TV variety show.

“And all through the South, there was this whole ruckus,” White remembered in the [2018 documentary “Betty White: First Lady of Television”]. “They were going to take our show off the air if we didn’t get rid of Arthur, because he was Black.”

... Duncan appeared on the show at least three times. On another episode, White interviewed a Black child during the kids’ segment.

It’s unclear if her decision to keep Duncan affected the show’s fate, but it was repeatedly rescheduled for different time slots before quietly being taken off the air that same year.

Other people prefer to remember moments like this.


For a couple days, Harry Reid's death dominated the news on Democratic-leaning outlets like MSNBC. I found myself changing the channel a lot.

Reid, like Chuck Schumer after him, led Democratic senators through an era during which Mitch McConnell was destroying the institution, producing our current dysfunctional Senate. Today, when the Senate avoids blowing up the world economy with a debt-ceiling crisis, it's considered an accomplishment. The Senate was designed to be the nation's center of debate, but in the current era the most important issues never even come to the floor.

In general, institutions based on good faith are hard to defend against determined bad-faith actors, so I'm not sure what Reid, Schumer, or any other Democratic leader should have done differently. But I also have a hard time celebrating their achievements.


Trump just endorsed his fellow fascist, Hungarian strongman Viktor Orban, who is facing a more unified opposition in an upcoming election.

Meanwhile, the EU is trying to find tools to discipline member countries that abandon democratic principles.


Rep. Eric Swalwell got a text message saying he should be hung or shot. He responded, and talked the guy down.


Department of Phony Outrage: First Kamala Harris spent money on cookware, and now National Review calls out AOC for eating outside in a restaurant in Florida.

Perfectly ordinary things become horrible when Democratic women of color do them. Remember when Michele Obama wore a sleeveless dress? That was in the days before it became OK for first ladies to have nude photos on the Internet. (Though a Black first lady still shouldn't try it, I suspect.)

President Biden is White and male, but he also has been behaving outrageously. @GOP tweeted:

Joe Biden has now been to Delaware 31 times since he took office. Americans are struggling to make ends meet and he is on vacation.

That led Aaron Ruper to reply:

At this point in Donald Trump’s term he had gone golfing 91 times

Of course, Trump was more motivated to take golf vacations to his clubs in Mar-a-Lago and Bedminster, because he made money off the government every time he did.


Twitter just deplatformed Marjorie Taylor Greene for violating their Covid disinformation policy. Essay question: Is limiting the public's exposure to Greene's insanity good or bad for Republicans in general?


Matt Yglesias makes an interesting observation:

US oil production in 2021 is going to come out well ahead of the average figure from the Trump years, and I feel like neither party is going to want to say that.

and let's close with something philosophical

Gingerbread Land is not just an eat-or-be-eaten society. Gingerbread people face ethical conundrums too.

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1971064-the-trolley-problem